Yes
No
N/A
Red
Amber
Green
N/A
|
|||
Controlling A Stage (CS) | |||
Project Name: |
Please enter a project name, this will be used to load and save your data, so please remember it! |
||
Criteria Question | Compliance | Quality | |
Authorising Work Package | |||
Has authorisation to proceed been given from the project board? | |||
Have work packages been documented? | |||
Have product descriptions been updated and used to create work packages? | |||
Have configuration item records been updated? | |||
Have the issue and risk logs been updated? | |||
Have product check lists been updated? | |||
Has the quality log been updated? | |||
Has the stage/exception plan been updated? | |||
Assessing Progress: | |||
Are there checkpoint meetings? | |||
Are the checkpoint meetings in the project plan? | |||
Are checkpoint meetings documented? | |||
Are risk, issue, quality logs and stage plans updated? | |||
Capturing Project Issues | |||
Are project issues recorded? | |||
Are all significant Issues recorded? | |||
Examining Project Issues | |||
Are key issues used to update the lessons learned log? | |||
Are the risks that caused issues recorded in the risk log? | |||
Reviewing Stage Status | |||
When there was a plan deviation was it identified in the controlling a stage process? | |||
Where there was a tolerance threat was it identified in the controlling a stage process? | |||
Is stage status reflected in highlight reports? | |||
Has business case impact been assessed? | |||
Reporting Highlights | |||
Are highlight reports produced? | |||
Do they reflect checkpoint reports over the reporting period? | |||
Do they reflect plan deviations and tolerance threats? | |||
Have highlight reports been reviewed by the project board? | |||
Have reports been sent to other stakeholders identified in the communications plan? | |||
Do highlight reports meet PRINCE2 standards? | |||
Taking Corrective Action | |||
Has the project board been approached for advice? | |||
Has the project board given advise on taking corrective action? | |||
Has the issue log been kept up to date? | |||
Escalating Project Issues | |||
Have exception reports been issued to the project board? | |||
Have exception reports been approved by the project board? | |||
Have exception plans been requested by the project board? | |||
Has advise been sought from the project board before submission of exception plans? | |||
Have exception plans been sent to the board? | |||
Receiving Completed Work Package | |||
Have work package status been reported? | |||
Are quality log entries completed for the work package? | |||
Have acceptance been documented from product recipients? | |||
Have configuration item record for delivered products been updated to completed? | |||
Maturity Model Rating For This Phase | |||
Level 1 - Initial
• Methodology is not being adopted
• Project success very unpredictable Level 2 - Managed
• Partial adoption of methodology
• Project success unpredictable Level 3 - Defined
• Variable adoption of methodology
• Some project predictability Level 4 - Quality
• Good adoption of methodology
• Projects generally predictable Level 5 - Optimised
• Full adoption of methodology
• Project very predictable |
|||
Phase Analysis | |||
|